Diffuser for aeration

ABSTRACT

Disclosed is a diffuser installation structure capable of improving uniformity of air bubbles discharged from air bubble discharge holes, restricting the formation of dead zone air bubble discharge holes, and having the tolerance against design deviation. In the installation structure for a diffuser including at least one air feeding port and an air bubble discharge wall having a plurality of air bubble discharge holes, the air bubble discharge wall is inclined upward in the direction of increasing distance relative to the air feeding port.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a diffuser for aeration.

A diffuser for aeration is an apparatus for generating a plurality ofair bubbles under water, and comprises an air intake passage and airbubble discharge holes. The diffuser for aeration is used to generateair bubbles, for instance, in the aeration tank of a water treatmentfacility, in the filtration tank of a water treatment facility usingfiltration, and in the bio-reactor of a water treatment facility using amembrane bio-reactor (MBR).

BACKGROUND ART

The aeration tank is used to decompose organic substances contained indirty water, wastewater and sewage by cultivating aerobicmicroorganisms. The diffuser for aeration, which is fluid-communicatedwith a blower, is installed on the bottom of the aeration tank. Thewastewater in the aeration tank is supplied with oxygen through airbubbles discharged from the diffuser for aeration. This oxygen is usedto cultivate the aerobic microorganisms contained in the wastewater.

The filtration tank is used to eliminate solid particles contained inthe wastewater through a filtration process. The filter tank is providedwith a filtering unit such as, for instance, a submerged membrane filtermodule. The diffuser for aeration, which is fluid-communicated with theblower, is installed below the submerged membrane filter module in thefiltration tank. The air bubbles discharged from the diffuser foraeration disturb water around the submerged membrane filter module. Themembrane is subject to vibration due to “collision with the air bubbles”and “water disturbance around the membrane”, so that fouling phenomenon(micro-pores of the membrane are blocked by deposition of the solidparticles) can be prevented.

In the bio-reactor, the solid particles are eliminated by the membranemodule, and simultaneously, the organic substances are decomposed by themicroorganisms. The air bubbles discharged from the diffuser foraeration installed on the bottom of the bioreactor prevents the foulingof the membrane while supplying oxygen to the microorganisms.

The air bubbles discharged from the diffuser for aeration can beclassified into micro air bubbles and macro air bubbles according to adiameter thereof. Typically, the air bubbles having a diameter fromabout 1 mm to about 3 mm are called micro air bubbles. The size of eachdischarged air bubble depends on a diameter of each air-bubble dischargehole. In general, the diameter of the air bubble is greater than thediameter of the air-bubble discharge hole. The micro air bubbles have anadvantage in that they have high efficiency of transmitting the oxygento the water. However, in order to increase physical cleaning effects ofthe air bubbles, it is advantageous to increase the size of the airbubbles discharged from the diffuser for aeration. For example, in thediffuser for aeration used for a membrane bio-reactor (MBR), thediameter of each air bubble discharge hole is typically designed withina range from about 1 mm to about 10 mm, and more frequently, within arange from about 3 mm to about 8 mm, by taking oxygen transmissioneffects and cleaning effects into consideration.

In the filter tank and the bio-reactor, the prevention of membranefouling by the air bubbles discharged from the diffuser for aeration iscalled “physical cleaning of the membrane by the air bubbles”. Withregard to the physical cleaning of the membrane by the air bubbles, themost fatal factor is the formation of a dead zone where a disturbancedegree of the water is extremely low. In particular, in the case of thebioreactor operating with high concentration microorganisms, if the deadzone is formed in the vicinity of the membrane, the surface blockade ofthe membrane may rapidly proceed due to sticky solid particles ofmicroorganisms, and, pressure applied to the membrane may rapidlyincrease.

The dead zone is formed around the membrane mainly because the amount ofair bubbles discharged from air bubble discharge holes of the diffuserfor aeration is not uniform. This phenomenon is called “non-uniformaeration”. If the discharge amount of the air bubbles that serve asdriving force for disturbing water is not uniform, the dead zone where adisturbance degree of the water is extremely low may be formed in thevicinity of the membrane.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing the conventional diffuserinstallation structure in which a membrane module fixing frame isintegrally formed with a diffuser for aeration. The diffuser 100 foraeration, which is in the form of a rectangular pipe having asubstantially U-shaped structure, is attached to a lower end portion ofthe frame 400. Air is fed into the diffuser 100 for aeration through anair feeding pipe 300. The membrane module is not shown in FIG. 1. Thediffuser 100 for aeration is provided with a plurality of air bubbledischarge holes which are directed upward. The frame 400 is installed ina filter tank while keeping the diffuser 100 for aeration in ahorizontal state. If the amount of air bubbles discharged from some ofair bubble discharge holes formed in the diffuser 100 for aeration isrelatively small, the dead zone may be formed in the vicinity of themembrane module positioned above the corresponding air bubble dischargeholes.

Hereinafter, the non-uniform aeration phenomenon occurred in thediffuser 100 for aeration will be described in detail with reference toFIG. 2. FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view showing a part of thediffuser 100 for aeration illustrated in FIG. 1. The diffuser 100 foraeration is provided with a plurality of air bubble discharge holes 111,112 113, 114 and 115 which are directed upward. The airflow is indicatedby arrows. The amount of air bubbles discharged from each air bubbledischarge hole is indicated by the height of the vertical arrows. In thediffuser 100 for aeration, a region located above the dotted line is anair layer and a region located below the dotted line is a water layer.In general, since air-flow resistance increases proportionally to thedistance relative to an air feeding port 101, the thickness of the airlayer in the diffuser 100 for aeration becomes reduced proportionally tothe distance relative to the air feeding port 101.

In the case of the submerged membrane system, typically, the diffuserfor aeration capable of discharging macro air bubbles having a diameterof about 5 mm or above is preferred. However, as the diameter of the airbubble discharge holes 111, 112 113, 114 and 115 becomes enlarged, thepressure difference related to the airflow is reduced at each air bubbledischarge hole, so that air is concentrated on the air bubble dischargeholes (for instance, 111 and 112), which are closest to the air feedingport 101. In an extreme case, air bubbles may not be discharged from theair bubble discharge hole (for instance, 115) located far away from theair feeding port 101. As a result, the dead zone may be formed above theair bubble discharge holes (for instance, 113 and 114) through which arelatively smaller amount of air bubbles are discharged, and especially,above the air bubble discharge hole 115 that does not discharge airbubbles.

The air bubble discharge holes (for instance, 113 and 114) through whicha relatively smaller amount of air bubbles is discharged and the airbubble discharge hole 115 that does not discharge air bubbles are called“dead zone air bubble discharge holes”. One of important factors inoperation of the water treatment facility is to reduce the number of thedead zone air bubble discharge holes.

In order to reduce the number of the dead zone air bubble dischargeholes, there has been suggested a method of increasing the amount of airintroduced into the air feeding port 101. If the amount of air fed intothe air feeding port 101 is increased (although the amount of airbubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole closest to the airfeeding port will be more increased), the air bubble discharge holeslocated far away from the air feeding port 101 may avoid being the “deadzone air bubble discharge holes”.

However, if the amount of air introduced into the air feeding portincreases, the blower is subject to great load, the membrane is damageddue to the excessive discharge of air bubbles, and the operation costfor the water treatment facility is increased. In contrast, if it ispossible to reduce the feed amount of air while reducing the number ofthe dead zone air bubble discharge holes, the operation cost can besaved.

Another method has been suggested to reduce the number of dead zone airbubble discharge holes. According to this method, the size of the airbubble discharge hole is adjusted while keeping the diffuser foraeration in a horizontal state. However, in this case, the non-uniformaeration phenomenon may not be sufficiently prevented. In addition, itis frequently necessary to set the diameter of the air bubble dischargeholes, which are located adjacent to the air feeding port, to be smallerthan the diameter required for physical cleaning.

In order to reduce the number of the dead zone air bubble dischargeholes, there has been suggested another method of heightening theposition of air bubble discharge holes formed in the diffuser foraeration such that the air bubble discharge holes have a higher positionproportionally to the distance relative to the air feeding port, whilekeeping the diffuser for aeration in a horizontal state. However, inthis case, the thickness of a region filled only with water may increaseat a lower portion of the distal end of the diffuser for aeration. Thewater remaining in the above region may stagnate because it does notreceive shear force of air-flow. Thus, as time goes by, sludge isdeposited, resulting in blockage of the air bubble discharge holes.

The further serious problem related to the diffuser for aeration is thatmost diffusers for aeration are designed under the condition that thediffusers for aeration are kept in the horizontal state. That is, underthe precondition that the diffusers for aeration are kept in thehorizontal state, the amount of air fed into the diffuser for aeration,the size of the air bubble discharge hole, and the position of the airbubble discharge hole are determined so that the non-uniform aerationphenomenon can be reduced.

However, in this case, when the diffuser for aeration is actuallyinstalled in the water treatment facility, if the diffuser for aerationis not precisely kept in the horizontal state, the diffuser for aerationdoes not achieve its intended design purpose, so that the non-uniformaeration may seriously occur. FIG. 3 is a view showing the diffuser foraeration which is not kept in the horizontal state. Since the diffuser100 for aeration is not kept in the horizontal state, the distal end ofthe diffuser for aeration, which is located far away from the airfeeding port 101, is sagged downward. Accordingly, the air layer, whichis located above the dotted line, may not extend to the air bubbledischarge holes 113, 114 and 115, and, the air bubble discharge holes113, 114 and 115 are immersed in the water layer. As a result, the airbubble discharge holes 113, 114 and 115 cannot discharge air bubbles,thus, the air bubble discharge holes 113, 114 and 115 become dead zonebubble discharge holes.

Actually, in the diffuser system for aeration, which is integrallyformed with a membrane module mounting frame, it is difficult tohorizontally install the frame in the filter tank. In addition, even ifthe diffuser for aeration is provided separately from the frame, sinceit is difficult to horizontally maintain the diffuser for aeration onthe bottom of the filter tank, the non-uniform aeration frequentlyoccurs in the diffuser for aeration. Such a non-uniform aerationphenomenon can be relieved by increasing the amount of air fed into thediffuser for aeration, but this may cause the above-mentioned problems.

There are various attempts in the world to restrict the non-uniformaeration phenomenon of the diffuser of aeration. However, these attemptslead to the complex structure of the diffuser for aeration. Such acomplex structure of the diffuser for aeration may increase themanufacturing cost of the diffuser for aeration and the installationcost of the water treatment facility.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION Technical Problem

The present invention provides a diffuser installation structure havinga simple structure, in which air bubbles can be uniformly dischargedfrom a plurality of air bubble discharge holes, thereby preventingformation of dead zone air bubble discharge holes, and in which thenon-uniform aeration phenomenon does not occur even if a diffuser foraeration is not kept in the horizontal state, that is, the installationstructure has a tolerance for deviation from the horizontal position ofthe diffuser for aeration (in other words, the installation structurehas a tolerance against deviation from design).

In addition, the present invention provides a diffuser module foraeration capable of uniformly distributing air into diffusers which arefluid-communicated with air outlet ports of a manifold.

Technical Solution

In order to achieve the above object, according to one aspect of thepresent invention,

there is provided an installation structure for a diffuser for aerationcomprising at least one air feeding port and an air bubble dischargewall having a plurality of air bubble discharge holes,

wherein the air bubble discharge wall is inclined upward in thedirection of increasing distance relative to the air feeding port.

The most important feature in the installation structure of a diffuserfor aeration (hereinafter, simply referred to as a diffuser) is that anair bubble discharge wall is inclined upward in the direction ofincreasing distance relative to an air feeding port. Here, the term “airbubble discharge wall” refers to the minimal part of the wall structureforming the diffuser, which contains air bubble discharge holes.

Due to the above feature of the present invention, when the diffuserinstallation structure of the present invention is used for aeration, anair layer formed in the diffuser extends easily to the diffuser's endwhich is located far away from the air feeding port (hereinafter, simplyreferred to as a distal end of the diffuser). Thus, even if a relativelysmaller amount of air is fed into the diffuser, the air bubble dischargeholes in adjacent to the distal end of the diffuser can discharge airbubbles sufficient for preventing the formation of dead zone. Inaddition, the air bubbles can be uniformly discharged from all theplural air bubble discharge holes.

Furthermore, in the case that the diffuser of the present invention canbe applied to the water treatment facility, even if the actualinclination angle of the air bubble discharge wall on the basis of thehorizontal plane slightly deviates from the designed inclination angle,(if the deviation angle is smaller than the designed inclination angle),the air bubble discharge wall still maintains the upward-inclination inthe direction of increasing distance relative to the air feeding port.Therefore, the serious non-uniform aeration which is occurred inconventional diffusers which are not kept in the horizontal state, canbe prevented or restricted in the present invention. Thus, the formationof the dead zone air bubble discharge holes can be still prevented inthe present invention. That is, the diffuser according to the presentinvention has the superior tolerance against deviation from design.

FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing a diffuser installation structureaccording to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 (a) is aperspective view showing diffusers that are fluid-communicated with anair feeding pipe. Two diffusers 100 and 100′ in the form of a tube areconnected to the air feeding pipe 200 through a fluid connection member250. That is, the two diffusers 100 and 100′ constitute a diffuser pair,in which the two diffusers 100 and 100′ are symmetrically disposed aboutthe fluid connection member 250. A plurality of air bubble dischargeholes are formed at an upper portion of the diffusers 100 and 100′.

FIG. 4 (b) is a front view showing diffusers that are fluid-communicatedwith the air feeding pipe. The diffusers 100 and 100′ are symmetricallydisposed about the fluid connection member 250 and are inclined upwardin the direction of the distal end of the diffuser. Thus, in the uppersurface of the diffuser, an air bubble discharge wall including a regionwhere the air bubble discharge holes are formed, is also inclined upwardin the direction of increasing distance relative to the fluid connectionmember 250.

FIG. 4 (c) is a sectional view showing the diffuser which is installedat the right side of the fluid connection member 250 in FIG. 4 (b). Aplurality of air bubble discharge holes 111, 112, 113, 114 and 115 areformed in the upper surface of the diffuser 100. During the aeration,air is fed into the diffuser 100 through an air feeding port 101, sothat air bubbles are discharged through the air bubble discharge holes111, 112, 113, 114 and 115. The air flow in the diffuser 100 isindicated by an arrow. In the diffuser 100, the region located above thedotted line is an air layer and the region located below the dotted lineis a water layer. The upper portion of the diffuser 100 where the airbubble discharge holes 111, 112, 113, 114 and 115 are formed, that is,the air bubble discharge wall is inclined upward in the direction ofincreasing distance relative to the air feeding port 101. When formingthe air layer in the above structure, the buoyancy applied to the airlayer may become an important factor in addition to the amount of airfed into the diffuser. That is, due to the buoyancy applied to the airlayer by the water layer, the air layer in the diffuser 100 (the regionabove the dotted line) may spontaneously and easily extend to the distalend of the diffuser 100. Such an air layer may have uniform thicknessover the whole area of the air bubble discharge wall. Thus, the airbubbles can be uniformly discharged from the air bubble discharge holes111, 112, 113, 114 and 115. Since the air layer readily extends to thedistal end of the diffuser 100, even if a relatively smaller amount ofair is fed through the air feeding port 101, the formation of dead zoneair bubble discharge holes, which do not discharge air bubbles ordischarge air bubbles insufficient for physical cleaning, can becompletely prevented or extremely restricted.

FIG. 5 is a partially sectional view illustrating the diffuser of FIG.4, that is installed with deviation from the original design. In FIG. 5,a diffuser module having an air feeding pipe 200, a fluid connectionmember 250 and two tube type diffusers 100 and 100′ which aresymmetrically disposed, is installed in such a manner that the designedvertical line deviates from the actual vertical line, in the right-sidedirection by an angle of Φ. Accordingly, the upward-inclination angle θ₁of the air bubble discharge wall of the right-side diffuser 100 relativeto the actual horizontal line is smaller than the upward-inclinationangle θ₂ of the air bubble discharge wall of the left-side diffuser 100′relative to the actual horizontal line (In FIG. 5, if the designedvertical line is identical to the actual vertical line, θ₁ equals toθ₂). However, in this case, if the deviation angle Φ is smaller than thedesigned upward-inclination angle θ₁ of the air bubble discharge wall ofthe right diffuser 100 relative to the horizontal line, the air bubbledischarge wall of the right-side diffuser 100 (as well as the air bubbledischarge wall of the left-side diffuser 100′) can still maintain theupward-inclination. Therefore, as indicated by the dotted line, the airlayer formed in the right-side diffuser 100 can easily extend to thedistal end of the diffuser 100. That is, the diffuser according to thepresent invention has a tolerance against deviation from design as longas the deviation angle Φ is smaller than the designed upward-inclinationangle of the air bubble discharge wall of the diffuser relative to thehorizontal line. Therefore, the serious non-uniform aeration, which isoccurred due to the deviation from design (that is, deviation from thehorizontal state) in conventional diffusers, can be completely preventedor extremely restricted in the present invention. Thus, the formation ofthe dead zone air bubble discharge holes can be prevented.

In the diffuser installation structure according to the presentinvention, the air bubble discharge wall may be inclined upward by afixed inclination angle in the direction of increasing distance relativeto the air feeding port. In this case, the air bubble discharge wallextends straightly from the air feeding port. The upward-inclinationangle of the air bubble discharge wall is not limited to a specificvalue. However, if the upward-inclination angle of the air bubbledischarge wall is too small, the upward-inclination effect of the airbubble discharge wall is too low. In contrast, if the upward-inclinationangle of the air bubble discharge wall is too large, the air bubbles areexcessively concentrated on the diffuser's distal end which climbssteeply. In this regard, preferably, the upward-inclination angle of theair bubble discharge wall may be about 3° to about 10°. More preferably,the upward-inclination angle of the air bubble discharge wall may beabout 7°. Most preferably, the upward-inclination angle of the airbubble discharge wall may be set in such a manner that the amount of airbubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole, which is closestto the air feeding port, is substantially identical to the amount of airbubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole located farmostaway from the air feeding port.

In the diffuser installation structure according to the presentinvention, the air bubble discharge wall is inclined upward withgradually increasing inclination angle proportionally to distancerelative to the air feeding port. In this case, the air bubble dischargewall may have a curved structure of, for example, a circular arc, anellipse arc, or a parabola.

As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the diffuser of the present invention has acircular-tube structure. However, the diffuser of the present inventionmay have various geometrical configurations. For instance, the diffusermay have a hexahedral structure having a rectangular sectional shape.

Although, in FIGS. 4 and 5, the fluid-communication between the pair ofdiffusers and the air feeding pipe is achieved through the fluidconnection member 250, this is illustrative purposes only. For instance,the pair of diffusers can be directly attached to both sides of the airfeeding pipe through welding, bonding, screw coupling, sleeve couplingor flange coupling. In addition, even when the pair of diffusers areconnected to the air feeding pipe through a fluid connection member, theshape of the fluid connection member can be variously modified from theshape of the fluid connection member 250 shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.

According to another aspect of the present invention,

there is provided a diffuser module comprising:

a tube type manifold having at least one air intake port and a pluralityof air outlet ports which are intermittently formed in an air flowdirection; and

a plurality of diffusers which are fluid-communicated with the airoutlet ports of the manifold,

wherein the manifold is inclined upward relative to a horizontal planein the air flow direction.

According to the diffuser module of the present invention, the manifoldthat serves to distribute air to the diffusers is inclined upwardrelative to a horizontal plane in the air flow direction. As a result,air can be uniformly distributed into the diffusers which arefluid-communicated with the air outlet ports of the manifold. Therefore,the diffuser module of the present invention can prevent the occurenceof dead zone diffuser. Here, the term “dead zone diffuser” refers to adiffuser that discharges air bubbles significantly less than air bubblesdischarged from any other diffuser which is fluid-communicated with themanifold.

FIG. 6 is an exploded perspective view illustrating the diffuser moduleaccording to an embodiment of the present invention. An air intake port210 and eight air outlet ports 220-1, 220-2, 220-3, 220-4, 220-5, 220-6,220-7, and 220-8 are formed in a circular tube type manifold 200. Theeight air outlet ports are formed downward from the bottom of themanifold 200 and are sequentially disposed at a predetermined intervalin the air flow direction indicated by the dotted arrow. The diffusersare connected with the air outlet ports of the manifold 200 for fluidcommunication. For instance, a diffuser 100-3 is connected with the airoutlet port 220-3 of the manifold 200. Although the remaining diffusersare also connected with other air outlet ports 220-1, 220-2, 220-4,220-5, 220-6, 220-7, and 220-8, they are omitted in FIG. 6 for thepurpose of simplicity. The fluid-communication between the air outletport 220-3 of the manifold 200 and the diffuser 100-3 is achievedthrough sleeve coupling between a sleeve formed on the air outlet port220-3 and a sleeve formed on the air feeding port 101-3. Although FIG. 6shows the sleeve coupling for achieving fluid-communication between theair discharge port of the manifold and the air feeding port of thediffuser, such fluid-communication can be achieved through other variousmeans. The main point is that the manifold 200 is inclined upwardrelative to a horizontal plane in the air flow direction indicated bythe dotted arrow. Accordingly, the central longitudinal axis of themanifold 200 forms an upward angle θm relative to the horizontal planein the air flow direction. That is, the distal end of the manifold 200located away from the air intake port 210 is inclined upward relative tothe air intake port 210. Due to the upward-inclination of the manifold200, the air feed amount from the air outlet ports 220-1, 220-2, 220-3,220-4, 220-5, 220-6, 220-7, and 220-8 to the corresponding diffusers canbe uniformly distributed.

According to the diffuser module of the present invention, the manifoldis inclined upward in the air flow direction relative to the horizontalplane by a fixed inclination angle. In this case, the upward-inclinationangle of the manifold is not limited to a specific value. However, ifthe upward-inclination angle of the manifold is too small, theupward-inclination effect of the manifold (that is, uniform distributionof air to each diffuser) may be too low. In contrast, if theupward-inclination angle of the manifold is too large, the air may beexcessively concentrated on the distal end of the manifold. In thisregard, preferably, the upward-inclination angle of the manifold may beabout 0.5° to about 1°.

According to another embodiment of the diffuser module of the presentinvention, the diffuser comprises at least one air feeding port and anair bubble discharge wall having a plurality of air bubble dischargeholes, in which the air bubble discharge wall is inclined upward in thedirection of increasing distance relative to the air feeding port.According to this embodiment, the air can be uniformly fed into theplural diffusers, which are fluid-communicated with the air outlet portsof the manifold, and the air bubbles can be uniformly discharged fromthe air bubble discharge holes of the diffusers. That is, the formationof the dead zone diffuser and the dead zone air bubble discharge holescan be prevented. For instance, this embodiment can be realized by usingthe diffuser pair shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, instead of the diffuser 100-3shown in FIG. 6. Since the details of the diffuser used in the diffusermodule of the present invention have already been described above, itwill not be further described below.

Advantageous Effects

In the diffuser installation structure according to the presentinvention, the diffuser for aeration is inclined upward so that an airlayer formed in the diffuser for aeration can extend to the distal endof the diffuser for aeration, which is located far away from the airfeeding port. Thus, even if a relatively smaller amount of air is fedinto the diffuser for aeration, the air bubble discharge holes locatedin the vicinity of the distal end of the diffuser for aeration candischarge air bubbles sufficient for preventing the formation of deadzone. In addition, the air bubbles can be uniformly discharged from theplural air bubble discharge holes. Further, the diffuser installationstructure according to the present invention has a superior toleranceagainst design deviation. In the diffuser module for aeration accordingto the present invention, a manifold that distributes air into aplurality of diffusers is inclined upward in the air flow direction.Thus, air can be uniformly distributed into the diffusers, which arefluid-communicated with air outlet ports of the manifold.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view illustrating the conventional diffuserinstallation structure, in which a membrane module fixing frame isintegrally formed with a diffuser for aeration;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view showing a part of the diffuser foraeration illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a sectional view showing the diffuser for aeration illustratedin FIG. 2, which is not kept in the horizontal state;

FIGS. 4 a-c are perspective views showing a diffuser installationstructure according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a partially sectional view illustrating the diffuser foraeration shown in FIG. 4 that deviates from the original design;

FIG. 6 is an exploded perspective view illustrating a diffuser modulefor aeration according to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 7 is a perspective view illustrating a diffuser module for aerationaccording to an embodiment of the present invention.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Examples

Fabrication of a Diffuser Module

In order to verify the effect of the diffuser installation structureaccording to the present invention against the non-uniform aeration, thediffuser module having a size suitable for the water treatment facilitywas fabricated as shown in FIG. 7.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view illustrating the diffuser module foraeration which was fabricated in this fabrication example. Eight pairsof circular tube type diffusers 100-1, 100-2, 100-3, 100-4, 100-5,100-6, 100-7, and 100-8 (which are similar to the pair of diffusersshown in FIG. 4) are fluid-communicated with the circular tube typemanifold 200. The fluid communication between the manifold and thediffusers is achieved through short tubes welded therebetween. The innerdiameter of the manifold 200 is 50 mm, the length of the manifold 200 is1450 mm, and the distal end of the manifold 200, which is opposite tothe air intake port, is closed. The left and right diffusers of eachdiffuser pair have inner diameters of 25 mm and lengths of 440 mm,respectively. Both ends of each diffuser pair are closed. Each diffuseris formed at an upper portion thereof with eight air bubble dischargeholes having a diameter of 5 mm. In each diffuser, the air dischargehole, which is closest to the air feeding port, is denoted as “a” andthe air discharge hole located farmost away from the air feeding port isdenoted as “b”.

In the eight pairs of diffusers 100-1, 100-2, 100-3, 100-4, 100-5,100-6, 100-7, and 100-8, the upward-inclination angle of the air bubbledischarge wall is identical to an inclination angle θd between thecentral longitudinal axis of the diffuser and the horizontal plane. Inaddition, the upward-inclination angle of the manifold 200 is identicalto an inclination angle θm between the central longitudinal axis of themanifold 200 and the horizontal plane.

In this fabrication example, six diffuser modules including air bubbledischarge walls having the upward-inclination angles θd of −3°, 0°, 3°,7°, 10°, and 15°, respectively, were fabricated. The negative anglerepresents the downward inclination. In each diffuser module, an airfeeding pipe 300 is connected with the air intake port of the manifold200 through an elbow 210 for fluid communication.

Installation of Diffuser Modules

The above diffuser modules were alternately mounted on the bottom of atest reservoir (length 2500 mm, width 1500 mm, and height 3800 mm). Theupward-inclination angle θm of the manifold 200 was determined byadjusting the height of a fixing clamp used for fixing the ends of themanifold 200.

Aeration Test

The depth of water in the test reservoir was maintained at 3 m. An airpump installed outside the test reservoir was fluid-connected with theair feeding pipe 300 to supply air to the air feeding pipe 300. Theamount of air supplied into the air feeding pipe 300 was 75 m³/hr(designed flow rate). The amount of air bubbles discharged from thediffuser was obtained by measuring the volume of the air bubblesdischarged from the air bubble discharge holes “a” and “b” of eachdiffuser, using an air collecting device and a flowmeter.

Upward-Inclination Effect of Diffusers

In order to verify the upward-inclination effect of diffusers againstthe non-uniform aeration, the amount of air bubbles discharged from thediffusers having the air bubble discharge wall having the inclinationangles θd of 3°, 7°, 10°, and 15° was measured in experimental examples1 to 4, respectively. In addition, the amount of air bubbles dischargedfrom the diffusers having the air bubble discharge wall having theinclination angles θd of −3° and 0° was measured in comparative examples1 and 2, respectively. In experimental examples 1 to 4 and comparativeexamples 1 and 2, the diffuser module was installed such that theupward-inclination angle θm of the manifold 200 is set to 0°.Experimental examples 1 to 4 and comparative examples 1 and 2 wereperformed under the same depth of water in the test reservoir and thesame amount of air supplied to the air feeding pipe. The measurementresult obtained from experimental examples 1 to 4 and comparativeexamples 1 and 2 is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 θd Amount of air bubbles discharged from diffuser(m³/hr) (°)Hole 100-1 100-2 100-3 100-4 100-5 100-6 100-7 100-8 Sum Experimental 3a 0.86 0.81 0.65 0.64 0.66 0.47 0.36 0.20 4.65 Example 1 b 0.78 0.630.58 0.56 0.43 0.28 0.16 0.05 3.47 Experimental 7 a 0.72 0.71 0.65 0.610.50 0.42 0.31 0.35 4.27 Example 2 b 0.74 0.69 0.58 0.65 0.56 0.43 0.390.25 4.29 Experimental 10 a 0.76 0.66 0.63 0.51 0.36 0.33 0.11 0 3.36Example 3 b 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.67 0.63 0.52 0.31 0.15 4.90 Experimental 15a 0.66 0.42 0.25 0.15 0.03 0 0 0 1.51 Example 4 b 1.06 0.85 0.88 0.620.60 0.55 0.28 0.22 5.06 Comparative −3 a 1.18 1.06 0.80 0.86 0.80 0.580.55 0.36 6.19 Example 1 b 0.46 0.31 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0.82 Comparative 0 a0.93 0.88 0.82 0.71 0.74 0.58 0.42 0.28 5.36 Example 2 b 0.82 0.61 0.580.45 0.37 0.15 0 0 2.98

In each diffuser, “a” is an air bubble discharge hole which is closestto the air feeding port, and “b” is an air bubble discharge hole locatedfarmost away from the air feeding port. As the difference betweenamounts of air bubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge holes“a” and “b” becomes smaller, the diffuser represents the superior effectagainst the non-uniform aeration phenomenon. Accordingly, the importantpoint, which is worthy of notice in Table 1, is the tendency ofdifference between amounts of air bubbles discharged from the air bubbledischarge holes “a” and “b” in the same diffuser according to theinclination angles θd of the air bubble discharge wall. In order toclearly understand such a tendency, the non-uniform aeration index (NAI)is defined as expressed in Equation 1, and the non-uniform aerationindex for each diffuser is calculated based on air bubble measurementdata shown in Table 1. The result is shown in Table 2.

$\begin{matrix}{{N\; A\;{I(\%)}} = {\frac{{a - b}}{\max\left( {a,b} \right)}100}} & {{MathFIG}.\mspace{14mu} 1}\end{matrix}$

In Equation 1, |a−| is an absolute value of difference between amountsof air bubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge holes “a” and“b”, and max(a,b) represents the greater one between amounts of airbubbles generated from air bubble discharge holes “a” and “b”.

TABLE 2 θd NAI (%) (°) 100-1 100-2 100-3 100-4 100-5 100-6 100-7 100-8Experimental 3 9.30 22.22 10.77 12.50 34.85 40.43 55.56 75.00 Example 1Experimental 7 2.70 2.82 10.77 6.15 10.71 2.33 20.51 28.57 Example 2Experimental 10 15.56 24.14 25.88 23.88 42.86 36.54 64.52 100 Example 3Experimental 15 37.74 50.59 71.59 75.81 95.00 100 100 100 Example 4Comparative −3 61.02 70.75 93.75 100 100 100 100 100 Example 1Comparative 0 11.83 30.68 29.27 36.62 50.00 74.14 100 100 Example 2

As shown in Table 2, in the case of experimental examples 1 and 2 inwhich the air bubble discharge walls have the upward-inclination anglesof 3° and 7°, respectively, the non-uniform aeration index (NAI) issignificantly reduced in all diffusers as compared with that ofcomparative examples 1 and 2 in which the air bubble discharge wallshave the upward-inclination angles of −3° and 0°, respectively. In thecase of experimental example 3 in which the air bubble discharge wallhas the upward-inclination angles of 10°, the non-uniform aeration index(NAI) is significantly reduced in most diffusers, except for thediffuser 100-8, as compared with that of comparative example 2 in whichthe air bubble discharge wall has the upward-inclination angles of 0°.It can be understood from the above result that the non-uniform aerationphenomenon of the diffuser is greatly improved if the air bubbledischarge wall has the upward-inclination angle. In the case ofcomparative example 1 in which the air bubble discharge wall has theupward-inclination angles of −3°, the number of diffusers having thenon-uniform aeration index of 100, that is, the number of diffusershaving air bubble discharge holes that do not discharge air bubbles isremarkably increased. Therefore, it can be understood that bad influenceis exerted upon the air distribution in the diffuser when the air bubbledischarge wall has the downward-inclination angle even if thedownward-inclination angle is very small.

In order to clearly understand the restriction effect for thenon-uniform aeration according to variation of the upward-inclinationangles, data of the diffuser 100-2 are extracted from Table 2. Thesedata are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Comparative Comparative Experimental Experimental ExperimentalExperimental Example 1 Example 2 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4θd −3 0 3 7 10 15 (°) NAI 70.75 30.68 22.22 2.82 24.14 50.59 (%)

As shown in Table 3, as the upward-inclination angle of the air bubbledischarge wall of the diffuser increases from −3° to 7°, the non-uniformaeration index of the diffuser 100-2 is significantly reduced. Inaddition, experimental example 2, in which the air bubble discharge wallhas the upward-inclination angle of 7°, represents the lowestnon-uniform aeration index. The important point, which is worthy ofnotice in Table 3, is that the non-uniform aeration index of thediffuser 100-2 is increased again as the upward-inclination angle of theair bubble discharge wall of the diffuser increases from 7° to 15°. Whenthe air bubble discharge wall has the upward-inclination angle of 10°,the non-uniform aeration index (NAI) is still remarkably reduced ascompared with that of comparative examples 1 and 2 in which theupward-inclination angle is not applied. However, when the air bubbledischarge wall has the upward-inclination angle of 15°, the non-uniformaeration index is lower than that of comparative example 1, in which thedownward-inclination angle is applied, but is higher than that ofcomparative example 2, in which the upward-inclination angle is notapplied. It can be understood from the above fact that the restrictioneffect for the non-uniform aeration is lowered, if the air bubbledischarge wall of the diffuser has the excessively highupward-inclination angle. This is because the air bubbles areexcessively concentrated on the air bubble discharge holes located atthe distal end of the diffuser when the air bubble discharge wall of thediffuser has the excessively high upward-inclination angle. As can beunderstood from Table 1, in experimental example 3 (upward-inclinationangle is 10°) and experimental example 4 (upward-inclination angle is15°), the amount of air bubbles discharged from the air discharge hole“b” is greater than the amount of air bubbles discharged from the airdischarge hole “a” in all diffusers, and the difference between amountsof air bubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge holes “a” and“b” is excessively increased when the upward-inclination angle is 15°.

Based on the variation tendency in the non-uniform aeration index (NAI)of the diffuser according to the upward-inclination angle of thediffuser, the upward-inclination angle can be optimally set in such amanner that the amount of air bubbles discharged from the air bubbledischarge hole “a”, which is closest to the air feeding port, can besubstantially identical to the amount of air bubbles discharged from theair bubble discharge hole “b” located farmost away from the air feedingport.

Upward-Inclination Effect of Manifold

In order to verify the restriction effect for the non-uniform aerationaccording to the upward-inclination of the manifold, in experimentalexamples 5 and 6, the diffuser module was installed such that theupward-inclination angle θm of the manifold is 0.5° and 1°,respectively, and, the amount of air bubbles was measured. In addition,the amount of air bubbles was measured in comparative example 3 byinstalling the diffuser module such that the upward-inclination angle θmof the manifold is set to 0°. In experimental examples 5 and 6 andcomparative example 3, the air bubble discharge walls of all diffusershave the same upward-inclination angle of 7°. In addition, experimentalexamples 5 to 6 and comparative example 3 were performed under the samedepth of water in the test reservoir and the same amount of air suppliedto the air feeding pipe. The measurement result obtained fromexperimental examples 5 to 6 and comparative example 3 is shown in Table4. Data of comparative example 3 is identical to that of experimentalexample 2.

TABLE 4 θm Amount of air bubbles discharged from diffuser(m³/hr) (°)Hole 100-1 100-2 100-3 100-4 100-5 100-6 100-7 100-8 Sum Experimental0.5 a 0.63 0.58 0.55 0.62 0.60 0.51 0.50 0.48 4.47 Example 5 b 0.57 0.520.60 0.55 0.56 0.48 0.50 0.45 4.23 Experimental 1.0 a 0.33 0.42 0.400.47 0.55 0.61 0.72 0.68 4.18 Example 6 b 0.36 0.35 0.45 0.49 0.52 0.710.68 0.73 4.29 Comparative 0 a 0.72 0.71 0.65 0.61 0.50 0.42 0.31 0.354.27 Example 3 b 0.74 0.69 0.58 0.65 0.56 0.43 0.39 0.25 4.29

The restriction effect for the non-uniform aeration according to theupward-inclination of the manifold can be determined based on uniformityof air distribution to diffusers which are fluid-communicated with themanifold. In Table 4, the diffusers have the higher sequence number asthe fluid connection position thereof is located farther away from theair intake port. That is, the diffuser 100-1 is fluid-connected with theair outlet port which is closest to the air intake port of the manifold,and the diffuser 100-8 is fluid-connected with the air outlet portlocated farmost away from the air intake port of the manifold. Inevaluation of the restriction effect for the non-uniform aerationaccording to the upward-inclination of the manifold, it is not quiteproper to compare the total amount of air supplied to the diffuser 100-1with the total amount of air supplied to the diffuser 100-8. Instead, itis preferred in terms of effectiveness to compare the amount of airbubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole “a” of thediffuser 100-1 with the amount of air bubbles discharged from the airbubble discharge hole “a” of the diffuser 100-8, and then compare theamount of air bubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole “b”of the diffuser 100-1 with the amount of air bubbles discharged from theair bubble discharge hole “b” of the diffuser 100-8. This is because thetechnical object of the present invention is to improve uniformity ofair bubbles discharged from all air bubble discharge holes of alldiffusers. In this regard, the manifold non-uniform aeration index(MNAI) is defined as expressed in Equation 2. And, based on data inTable 4, the variation of the manifold non-uniform aeration index (MNAI)according to the upward-inclination angle θm of the manifold is shown inTable 5.

$\begin{matrix}{{{M\; N\; A\; I\text{-}{a(\%)}} = {\frac{{a_{\lbrack{100\text{-}1}\rbrack} - a_{\lbrack{100\text{-}8}\rbrack}}}{\max\left( {a_{\lbrack{100\text{-}1}\rbrack},a_{\lbrack{100\text{-}8}\rbrack}} \right)}100}}{{M\; N\; A\; I\text{-}{b(\%)}} = {\frac{{b_{\lbrack{100\text{-}1}\rbrack} - b_{\lbrack{100\text{-}8}\rbrack}}}{\max\left( {b_{\lbrack{100\text{-}1}\rbrack},b_{\lbrack{100\text{-}8}\rbrack}} \right)}100}}} & {{MathFIG}.\mspace{14mu} 2}\end{matrix}$

In Equation 2, a[100-1] is an amount of air bubbles discharged from theair bubble discharge hole “a” of the diffuser 100-1, a[100-8] is anamount of air bubbles discharged from the air bubble discharge hole “a”of the diffuser 100-8, b[100-1] is an amount of air bubbles dischargedfrom the air bubble discharge hole “b” of the diffuser 100-1, andb[100-8] is an amount of air bubbles discharged from the air bubbledischarge hole “b” of the diffuser 100-8.

TABLE 5 θm (°) MNAI-a (%) MNAI-b (%) Comparative 0 51.39 66.22 Example 3Experimental 0.5 23.81 21.05 Example 5 Experimental 1 51.47 50.68Example 6

As shown in Table 5, as the upward-inclination angle of the manifoldincreases from 0° to 0.5°, the manifold non-uniform aeration indexes aand b (MNAI-a, MNAI-b) are significantly lowered. In addition, when theupward-inclination angle of the manifold is 1°, the manifold non-uniformaeration index b (MNAI-b) is remarkably lowered (from 66.22% to 50.68%)as compared with the case where the upward-inclination angle of themanifold is 0°. Accordingly, it can be understood that uniformity of airdistribution to the diffusers, which are fluid-connected to themanifold, can be improved when the manifold has the upward-inclinationangle.

In addition, it can be understood from data of experimental examples 5and 6 that the manifold non-uniform aeration indexes a and b (MNAI-a,MNAI-b) are increased again as the upward-inclination angle of themanifold increases from 0.5° to 1°. That is, as shown in data ofexperimental example 6 in Table 4, if the manifold has an excessiveupward-inclination angle, the air is concentrated on the diffuserlocated far away from the air intake port of the manifold, so theuniformity of air distribution to the diffusers may deteriorate.

In the Examples of the present invention employing the diffuser moduleshown in FIG. 6, the preferred upward-inclination angle of the airbubble discharge wall of the diffuser is about 7°, and the preferredupward-inclination angle of the manifold is about 0.5°. However, thesenumerical values may vary according to environmental parameters of thewater treatment system to which the present invention is applied.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The diffuser for aeration of the present invention can be used togenerate air bubbles, for instance, in the aeration tank of a watertreatment facility, in the filtration tank of a water treatment facilityusing filtration, and in the bio-reactor of a water treatment facilityusing a membrane bio-reactor (MBR).

1. A diffuser module comprising: a tube manifold having at least one airintake port and a plurality of air outlet ports which are intermittentlyformed in an air flow direction; and a plurality of diffusers which arefluid-communicated with the air outlet ports of the manifold, whereinthe manifold is inclined upward relative to a horizontal plane in theair flow direction, wherein the diffusers have at least one air feedingport and an air bubble discharge wall having a plurality of air bubbledischarge holes, wherein the air bubble discharge wall is inclinedupward in the direction of increasing distance relative to the airfeeding port.